My official stance?
They asked for a PK, I brought it to the admin team and instead, it was toned down to a TK with you being ICly transported to the Army Warehouses and losing a fair portion of your item in response (This ended up being your rifle and suit) and interrogated for the reasons Freedom stated. This is all we had at the time and with the situation you were in (Locked away in a room, inside Freedom base) we went ahead with that.
The problems rose when you kept arguing that ICly, 'Sparrow' would've been there to prevent this. That, in my eyes isn't an argument and members of the admin team failed to see it as an argument as well. Your excuse of a 'previous iteration' is literally null at this point because A - previous interaction.
Now, at this point you refused to roleplay due to your constant argument that 'Sparrow' should've been there. Sadly, he wasn't but your whole basis was that ICly, they would be here but of course, they weren't due to OOC matters they were attending too. I mean, you can't deny you continued to re-iterate this point when you constantly filled LOOC with sparrow quoting that Freedom should OOCly stand down until he's there. But, that was an OOC issue, not an IC one. Still, Freedom went ahead with the RP and lone-behold, you refused to RP. I believe when you were banned you even said 'You might as well have banned me for thirty minutes, because that's when Sparrow gets home'. But, there were logs I believe provided that stated that due to your refusal to RP, 'Sparrow' would just be taking a step back and letting the admins deal with your refusal to RP and in turn, you were given a ban for 2 days because of this.
You were banned not because of the scenario, you were banned due to the fact that you refused to roleplay the situation out. To the point where we explicitly said in Teamspeak, "Are you refusing to roleplay?" in which you replied with "Yes." and in turn, banned because of this. The very fact that Sparrow said 'let the admins handle it' brought us to the ban, seeing as you were refusing to do anything ICly until Sparrow arrived.
I have nothing against you and alongside that, I wasn't the one who banned you.
9:15 PM - ****: Rokhazula literally said
9:15 PM - ****: even if you're correct you aren't getting unbanned
This is even better, if it's not Scouser then it's probably someone else but none the less. My stance is this, if the admin team comes to a decision to void the roleplay then yes, it's highly likely you will be unbanned seeing as the RP is null and void. But, if in scenarios that aren't in your favour that at the current time end up with you refusing to RP? You're getting a ban, there's no way around it. I was given reasons for the PK, not the multide of scenarios surrounding it(Brief notes were made to the shootout and how people overheard Phoenix talking about Freedom). The reason why it was toned down to a TK was mainly due to 'suspicion' rather than utmost agreement that Phoenix was a spy. This is why, the IC reasoning was that he was sent off to the Army Warehouses for interrogation and eventually ended up back in the area.
If I was looking for a detective though, I'd gladly pay for your services McCrae seeing as I evidently dig into the scenario as much as you did (Namely because this is the first I've heard of the shootout and Phoenix being a suspected spy). And, to that I apologize. But, much like I've stated. I was given the information I was given and acted upon it at the time seeing as the situation was on-going at the time. Still, I go by the reason of the ban. Because you refused to roleplay at the current time with your argument mainly being due to 'Sparrow' not being there and that ICly, she would've been. Even when I tried to dig further, your response was only 'you don't understand' or 'how can you not see' which to be honest, aren't arguments at all until you fully explain them.
Still, this is my general opinion upon the matter and my statement towards all of this.
