[1999]ShenPls;392978 said:You probably could as long as you had a reason. S2K is sadly still a very contextual thing without much explanation attached.
Desird said:My character Epsilon, actually approached two Freedomers, asking them where Vigilance was because Epsilon is interested in joining the group. Iron can attest to my character asking his (Ingrid) for directions. I was searching for Vigilance, and then I saw a stream of people following a merc radsuit that suddenly turned around and went crazy.
This isn't the first time either Decaro, you keep fucking doing the same thing, over, and over, and over again. Stop.
Decaro said:-snip-.
Decaro said:You're not without S2K sins yourself. Remember that one time you used rpa_observe to murder both toastmatic and I after we were engaged in S2K? Or all those countless times you ran up to people roleplaying and blasted them from behind because you thought baldries were allowed?
Either way, I don't see how S2King is suddenly the worse thing someone could possibly do, or even comparable to much more over-sighted things such as metagaming. At very most, it warrants an admin to !bring the "victim", delete three items and replace them, which most of the time, the "victim" is very happy about because they don't have to buy repairs now. I'm not saying it's a permissible thing to do, but I feel like I'm being accused of devouring live infants.
Desird said:You'll use any excuse to just engage in an S2K, funnyweed like I stated in the past said that he was S2Ming, you without questioning the intent of the shots turned around and gunned everyone down.
When I was on my baldry, yet again, I'll state it that I s2m gave the people an opportunity to react.
Everytime I've rdm'd I was always provoked by another player be it minge or revenge rdm. Is it right? No. But your RDM's go without a sense of justification besides a fucking hunch of metagame which was not the case. You've done the same shit countless of times. I defended you on your previous unban regarding AZN. I said if it was provoked rdm then by all means be unbanned. And no, even revenge rdm or stopping a minge by rdming them is not a good habbit, a habbit I'm actively trying to fight by walking away/ignoring them.
lonewolf1925 said:If you take actions into your own hands and you do not allow the admins to take care of it, you will be Permanently banned on the spot.
Neuf said:"When I RDM it's because I've justified it myself."
Desird said:Yeah, sure, you can paint it like that, but when there are retards who are physgunning my props to shit and unfreezing my dups to minge, and I blast them in the head, it's different from just blasting someone in the head for no reason. And like I said at the end of the post you quoted but appeared to miss. It's a habbit I'm actively trying to fight by walking away/ignoring them. I didn't say it's a good thing, but its 'better' regardless both are against the rules and I know that.
Hey, question. Why pointing fingers at Floki when Decaro did the same fucking thing? Just shut up.Neuf said:Either way, it's against the rules. If you're breaking the rules to force your own standards, you're still breaking the rules. It's not better.
Altairp said:Hey, question. Why pointing fingers at Floki when Decaro did the same fucking thing? Just shut up.
Tunka.C said:I'll never trust the administration (SRP) to thoroughly scan through FTP, or any kind of box logs whatsoever. You can call this whatever you like, whether it be for the thread or not. But it's gotten to the point where it's absolutely ridiculous how easily swayed the administration can be. Through my past experiences, on multiple occasions have the administration stated, and briefly declared that they search FTP logs searching for remnants of roleplay, or transactions that my characters upheld. They were not able to successfully do so, as this has been proven countless times in the past. As new circle-jerks arise, and such as new photos that confirms only what I have suspected () It's safe to say that whatever the admins might, "search" for, won't be found.
The thread has been dissolved from it's main point, that Decaro RDM'd, and thus fingers are being pointed once again to sway from the obvious wrongdoing. Frankly, I'm not sure how the thread got to this point: whereas people start arguing semantics, and how two wrongs make a right. So we'll get down to the bullet points because these are the points that actually count:
• Interesting screenshots.
• Decaro's character is followed.
• For some reason, or another, Decaro expects metagame from people... Following him? (not sure what Decaro or his character is expecting from here)
• Decaro takes it into his own hands, and RDMs everybody to avoid roleplay.
• Shit is flung both sides, one claiming that they've roleplayed, the other calling metagame.
• Administration states they'll scan through logs (they won't find any lmao)
• Thread dissolved from it's main point, and re-directed to opposition who's rooting for the ban.
http://fixthenetcode.com/