Rolling system and d20 cap. [Question]

[Hamburguejas al vapor]

Is it possible to change the rolling system so it can go past d20?

I've asked multiple admins, they aren't certain about it and i'm confused. I really wonder it's possible.

I'm trying to do a roulette system where the rolling system works as the "ball" of the roulette, the main problem is that the rp_roll system is stuck at d20 max. You cannot do commands like "1d40" because by default it stays at 20.


] rp_roll 1d40
Hector Arce rolled 1d20: (18) = 18
] rp_roll 1d40
Hector Arce rolled 1d20: (15) = 15
] rp_roll 1d40
Hector Arce rolled 1d20: (2) = 2
] rp_roll 1d40
Hector Arce rolled 1d20: (4) = 4
] rp_roll 1d40
Hector Arce rolled 1d20: (8) = 8
] rp_roll 1d40
Hector Arce rolled 1d20: (17) = 17
] rp_roll 1d40
Hector Arce rolled 1d20: (14) = 14
] rp_roll 1d40
Hector Arce rolled 1d20: (9) = 9



I wonder if this can be changed, atleast move the cap to 50, it would allow for more /roll games like poker, roulette, craps, etc.

I'm sorry if i'm being annoying with this question, i just wanted to know if it's possible to change the system before re-designing my games again.

 

[Imp]

i could probably make it go up to a D100 since thats a very real set of dice used in actual games

 

[Hamburguejas al vapor]

i could probably make it go up to a D100 since thats a very real set of dice used in actual games

Could you do that? That would give me more ground to make betting games and such other things, it would be greatly appreciated.

 

[Kiako]

Could you do that? That would give me more ground to make betting games and such other things, it would be greatly appreciated.

In the meantime you could just do 5d20.

 

[Fig Jig]

In the meantime you could just do 5d20.

I doubt 1-5 are used too often

 

[Hamburguejas al vapor]

In the meantime you could just do 5d20.

If i have a roulette that goes up to 37, using 2 or more rolls leaves out the number 1 completely.

 

[Kiako]

If i have a roulette that goes up to 37, using 2 or more rolls leaves out the number 1 completely.

So do... 7d5 and one 1d2.
Or 2d20-3

 

[Hamburguejas al vapor]

So do... 7d5 and one 1d2.
Or 2d20-3

It's too random, smaller numbers are rare, it's too hard to count and do individually.

 

[Kiako]

It's too random, smaller numbers are rare, it's too hard to count and do individually.

I mean, statistically yes, smaller numbers are more rare if you're going up to 37. Isn't that the point, or am I misunderstanding something.